¾­ÀíÈË¹ÉÆ±ÆÚȨµÄ¶¨¼Û

2014.10.13

Ͷ¸å£ºÁõº£Äþ²¿ÃÅ£º¾­¼ÃѧԺä¯ÀÀ´ÎÊý£º

»î¶¯ÐÅÏ¢

¹¦·ò£º 2014Äê10ÔÂ30ÈÕ 14:00

µØÖ·£º У±¾²¿¶«Çø¾­¹Ü´óÂ¥520»áÒéÊÒ

 
Executive  Stock  Option  Pricing  in  China£¨¾­ÀíÈË¹ÉÆ±ÆÚȨµÄ¶¨¼Û£©
Ñݽ²ÈË£ºÀîÓ  ¸±½ÌÊÚ
ʱ   ¼ä£º2014Äê10ÔÂ30ÈÕ£¨ÖÜËÄ£©ÏÂÎç 2:00£­3:30
µØ   µã£ºÐ£±¾²¿¶«Çø¾­¹Ü´óÂ¥  520»áÒéÊÒ
Ñݽ²±êÌ⣺ Executive  Stock  Option  Pricing  in  China
Ö÷°ìµ¥Ôª£ºÐ±¦GG¾­¼ÃѧԺ¡¢Ð±¦GG½ðÈÚÐÅÏ¢×êÑÐÖÐÐÄ

Õª  Òª£ºThis paper analyzes the effect of firm risk on the implementation of executive stock options. A sample of 50 Chinese listed companies’ Executive Stock Options (ESOs) is priced by the ESO pricing method under FASB 123, which is based on the Stochastic Volatility model. It is found that firm risk significantly affects the total grant value of ESOs. Firms with higher risk and better growth opportunities are likely to have a higher ESO proportion in the executive incentives plans. The effects of executive shareholding proportion, leverage ratio, and market value on ESOs are also examined.

Ñݽ²È˼ò½é£º
ÀîÓ£¬ÖйúÈËÃñ´óѧººÇྭ¼ÃÓë½ðÈڸ߼¶×êÑÐÔº¸±½ÌÊÚ¡¢½ðÈÚϵϵÖ÷ÈÎ ¡£ÔøÈνÌÓÚÖÐɽ´óѧÖÎÀíѧԺ ¡£2007Äê±ÏÒµÓÚÏã¸ÛÖÐÎÄ´óѧͳ¼ÆÏµ»ñµÃ²©Ê¿Ñ§Î» ¡£2011-2012ÄêÔÚÐÂ¼ÓÆÂÖÎÀí´óѧSim Kee Boon½ðÈÚ¾­¼Ãѧ×êÑлú¹¹×ö²©Ê¿ºó ¡£×êÑÐÐËÖÂΪ½ðÈÚ¼ÆÁ¿Ñ§¡¢±´Ò¶Ë¹ºê¹Û¾­¼Ã¼ÆÁ¿Ñ§ ¡£ËûµÄÖØÒª×êÑÐÊǸĽø±´Ò¶Ë¹²½ÖèÀûÓÃÓÚ·ÖÎöÖ÷Á÷½ðÈÚËæ»úµßô¤Ä£ÐÍ ¡£ËûÒÑÔÚJournal of Econometrics, Journal of Mathematical Finance, Economic Modeling, Computational Economics,¡¶¾­¼Ã×êÑÓ×·£¬¡¶ÖÎÀíÊÀ½ç¡·µÈ¹úÄÚ±íÓÅÁ¼¿¯ÎïÉϰ䷢Á˽ü¶þʮƪѧÊõÂÛÎÄ ¡£

 Ó­½Ó¸÷λ½ÌÔ±Óë×êÑÐÉú²Î¼Ó»áÉÌ£¡

¡¾ÍøÕ¾µØÍ¼¡¿